Appeals Court Rejects DMCA Constitutional Challenge, Because Apparently Fair Use Means Nothing Good Will Ever Be Published

Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:39:21 +1000

Andrew Pam <xanni [at] glasswings.com.au>

Andrew Pam
<https://www.techdirt.com/2024/08/06/appeals-court-rejects-dmca-constitutional-challenge-because-apparently-fair-use-means-nothing-good-will-ever-be-published/>

"What began as an attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the DMCA’s
terrible anticircumvention provision has now backfired. A court ruling will
limit our rights to fair use and free expression in favor of Hollywood’s
ability to lock stuff down with digital locks.

It’s not great.

I had thought we had gotten past the era when courts would deal with copyright
cases by accepting the Hollywood copyright extremist position — that without
copyright nothing at all would ever get published — as fact. But the DC Circuit
appeals court has done exactly that, in a case that wasn’t even suggesting that
copyright should go away, just that fair use should be applied to all of it.

The DC Circuit appeals court has now rejected a challenge to the DMCA’s Section
1201 (the anti-circumvention bit) based on how it suppresses First
Amendment-protected speech."

Cheers,
       *** Xanni ***
--
mailto:xanni@xanadu.net               Andrew Pam
http://xanadu.com.au/                 Chief Scientist, Xanadu
https://glasswings.com.au/            Partner, Glass Wings
https://sericyb.com.au/               Manager, Serious Cybernetics

Comment via email

Home E-Mail Sponsors Index Search About Us